Dari sudut pemahaman teoritikal, be

Dari sudut pemahaman teoritikal, beberapa penerangan teori telah dikemukakan bagi memahami permasalahan kajian ini secara lebih mendalam. Teori pilihan misalnya, berhujah bahawa tingkah laku agresif adalah hasil keputusan rasional individu yang dilakukan mempunyai tujuan, makna, manfaat, dan komited setiap kali mereka melakukannya (Jackson & Knepper, 2003: 69; lihat juga Siegel, 2002: 47). Andaian utama teori ini adalah manusia pada dasarnya rasional dan hedonistik, iaitu memiliki kebebasan dan membuat keputusan-keputusan yang disengajakan untuk berkelakuan berdasarkan pengiraan keperitan dan keseronokan (McCaghy, Capron & Jameson, 2003: 12). Oleh itu, melanggar undang-undang dilakukan jika ganjaran yang berkaitan dengan tindakan yang dianggap menjadi lebih besar daripada hukuman (Siegel, 2002: 48).

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

From the point of understanding theoretical framework, a number of theories have been forwarded for information to understand the problems the study in more depth. For instance, choice theory argue that aggressive behaviour is the result of rational decisions individuals have purpose, meaning, benefits, and committed every time they do it (Jackson & Knepper, 2003:69; see also Siegel, 2002:47). Key assumptions this theory was fundamentally rational and human hedonistik, which had the freedom and make deliberate decisions to behave based on the calculation of the strains and pleasures (McCaghy, Capron & Jameson, 2003:12). Therefore, in violation of the law is done if rewards incidental to actions which are considered to be larger than a sentence (Siegel, 2002:28).

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

From a theoretical understanding, some explanatory theories have been advanced for this study to understand the issues in more depth. Choice theory, for example, argued that aggressive behavior is the result of rational decisions of individuals who do have a purpose, a meaning, benefit, and committed every time they do so (Jackson & Knepper, 2003: 69; see also Siegel, 2002: 47). The main assumption of this theory is people are basically rational and hedonistic, ie have the liberty and making deliberate decisions to behave based on calculations of pain and pleasure (McCaghy, Capron & Jameson, 2003: 12). Therefore, breaking the law do if rewards associated with the actions perceived to be greater than the punishment (Siegel, 2002: 48).